Directions (Q. 27-31): In each of the given questions, some statements are followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Give answer:
1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either I or II follows.
4) if neither I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow
27. Statements : Some resources are powerful., All resources are significant , All significant are organised.
Conclusions: I. Some organised are not significant.
II. All organised being powerful is a possibility.
28. Statements: All regular are successful, Some funds are regular, All exercises are funds.
Conclusions: I. All exercises being successful is a possibility.
II. At least some regular are funds.
29. Statements: All regular are successful, Some funds are regular, All exercises are funds.
Conclusions: I. Some successful being exercises is a possibility.
II. Some funds can never be exercises.
30. Statements : No society is standard, No standard is modern, No modern is official.
Conclusions: I. Some societies being modern is a possibility.
II. Some societies can never be official.
31. Statements : All attire are balanced. All balanced are critical. Some critical are delightful. All delightful are effective.
Conclusions: I. All critical being attire is a possibility.
II. Some balanced are delightful.
Directions (Q. 32-36): Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below.
A, B, C, D, E and F are six ambassadors of six different countries viz. Brazil, India, China, France, Australia, Russia but not necessarily in the same order. They are sitting around a circular table for discussing six different topics viz Trade, LOC, Terrorism, World peace, Environment and Development. But not necessarily in the same order. Only one person gives his views on one topic only.
(a) ‘Development, Terrorism and World Peace’ pointing persons are neither from ‘France’ nor from ‘Brazil’.
(b) Ambassadors from ‘India’ and ‘China’ are neither is pointing ‘Development’ nor ‘Terrorism’.
(c) A is neither from ‘France’ nor on the immediate left of the person who has pointed ‘Environment’.
(d) The only ambassador who is between ‘E’ and ‘F’ is pointing ‘LOC’.
(e) ‘D’ has his discussion about ‘Environment’ and he is from ‘China’. He is facing the person who has his views on ‘LOC’.
(f) The one who is delivering about ‘Development’ is seated opposite to the person who is from ‘Russia’, while China’s ambassador is on the left of the person, who is noticing World Peace.
(g) One who discussed about ‘Trade’ is on the immediate right of France’s ambassador but on the immediate left of the person who has briefed about ‘Terrorism’.
(h) ‘C’ is not pointing ‘Terrorism’ while ‘F’ has no points for ‘Development’. F has discussion about trade and immediate left of the person who dicussion terrorism.
32. Who among the following is France's ambassador?
1) A 2) B 3) C 4) E 5) None of these
33. The only ambassador between E and D is noticing which of the following topics?
1) World Peace 2) LOC 3) Development 4) Environment 5) None of these
34. Who among the following has a discussion about 'World Peace'?
1) E 2) B 3) A 4) C 5) E
35. Which of the following is correctly matched?
1) A-India-Environment 2) B-Australia-Terrorism 3) E-Australia-Development
4) F-Brazil-World Peace 5) None of these
36. 'Trade' pointing person is from which country?
1) Australia 2) India 3) Russia 4) Brazil 5) None of these
27. 2
28. 5
29. 1
29. 1
31. 1
32-36)
32- 3 33- 1 34-3 35-3 36-4
1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either I or II follows.
4) if neither I nor II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow
27. Statements : Some resources are powerful., All resources are significant , All significant are organised.
Conclusions: I. Some organised are not significant.
II. All organised being powerful is a possibility.
28. Statements: All regular are successful, Some funds are regular, All exercises are funds.
Conclusions: I. All exercises being successful is a possibility.
II. At least some regular are funds.
29. Statements: All regular are successful, Some funds are regular, All exercises are funds.
Conclusions: I. Some successful being exercises is a possibility.
II. Some funds can never be exercises.
30. Statements : No society is standard, No standard is modern, No modern is official.
Conclusions: I. Some societies being modern is a possibility.
II. Some societies can never be official.
31. Statements : All attire are balanced. All balanced are critical. Some critical are delightful. All delightful are effective.
Conclusions: I. All critical being attire is a possibility.
II. Some balanced are delightful.
Directions (Q. 32-36): Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below.
A, B, C, D, E and F are six ambassadors of six different countries viz. Brazil, India, China, France, Australia, Russia but not necessarily in the same order. They are sitting around a circular table for discussing six different topics viz Trade, LOC, Terrorism, World peace, Environment and Development. But not necessarily in the same order. Only one person gives his views on one topic only.
(a) ‘Development, Terrorism and World Peace’ pointing persons are neither from ‘France’ nor from ‘Brazil’.
(b) Ambassadors from ‘India’ and ‘China’ are neither is pointing ‘Development’ nor ‘Terrorism’.
(c) A is neither from ‘France’ nor on the immediate left of the person who has pointed ‘Environment’.
(d) The only ambassador who is between ‘E’ and ‘F’ is pointing ‘LOC’.
(e) ‘D’ has his discussion about ‘Environment’ and he is from ‘China’. He is facing the person who has his views on ‘LOC’.
(f) The one who is delivering about ‘Development’ is seated opposite to the person who is from ‘Russia’, while China’s ambassador is on the left of the person, who is noticing World Peace.
(g) One who discussed about ‘Trade’ is on the immediate right of France’s ambassador but on the immediate left of the person who has briefed about ‘Terrorism’.
(h) ‘C’ is not pointing ‘Terrorism’ while ‘F’ has no points for ‘Development’. F has discussion about trade and immediate left of the person who dicussion terrorism.
32. Who among the following is France's ambassador?
1) A 2) B 3) C 4) E 5) None of these
33. The only ambassador between E and D is noticing which of the following topics?
1) World Peace 2) LOC 3) Development 4) Environment 5) None of these
34. Who among the following has a discussion about 'World Peace'?
1) E 2) B 3) A 4) C 5) E
35. Which of the following is correctly matched?
1) A-India-Environment 2) B-Australia-Terrorism 3) E-Australia-Development
4) F-Brazil-World Peace 5) None of these
36. 'Trade' pointing person is from which country?
1) Australia 2) India 3) Russia 4) Brazil 5) None of these
27. 2
28. 5
29. 1
29. 1
31. 1
32-36)
32- 3 33- 1 34-3 35-3 36-4
No comments:
Post a Comment